John - 6:52



52 The Jews therefore contended with one another, saying, "How can this man give us his flesh to eat?"

Verse In-Depth

Explanation and meaning of John 6:52.

Differing Translations

Compare verses for better understanding.
The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
The Jews therefore strove one with another, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
The Jews therefore contended among themselves, saying, How can he give us this flesh to eat?
The Jews, therefore, were striving with one another, saying, 'How is this one able to give us his flesh to eat?'
This led to an angry debate among the Jews. "How can this man," they argued, "give us his flesh to eat?"
Then the Jews had an angry discussion among themselves, saying, How is it possible for this man to give us his flesh for food?
The Jews therefore argued with one another, saying, 'How can this man give us his flesh to eat?'
Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, "How can this man give us his flesh to eat?"
They began disputing with one another, "How is it possible for this man to give us his flesh to eat?"

*Minor differences ignored. Grouped by changes, with first version listed as example.


Historical Commentaries

Scholarly Analysis and Interpretation.

The Jews therefore debated among themselves. He again mentions the Jews, not by way of honor, but to reproach them with their unbelief, because they do not receive the well known doctrine concerning eternal life, or, at least, do not inquire modestly into the subject, if it be still obscure and doubtful. For when he says that they debated, it is a sign of obstinacy and contempt; and those who dispute so keenly do, indeed, block up against themselves the road to the knowledge of the truth. And yet the blame imputed to them is not simply that they inquired into the manner; for the same blame would fall on Abraham and the blessed Virgin, (Genesis 15:2; Luke 1:34.) Those persons, therefore, are either led astray through ignorance, or are deficient in candour, who, without taking into account the hardihood and eagerness to quarrel, which alone the Evangelist condemns, direct all their outcry against the word how; as if it had not been lawful for the Jews to inquire about the manner of eating the flesh of Christ [1] But it ought rather to be imputed to sloth than ascribed to the obedience of faith, if we knowingly and willingly leave unsolved those doubts and difficulties which are removed for us by the word of the Lord. Not only is it lawful, therefore, to inquire as to the manner of eating the flesh of Christ, but it is of great importance for us to understand it, so far as it is made known by the Scriptures. Away, then, with that fierce and obstinate pretense of humility, "For my part, I am satisfied with that single word of Christ, when he declares that his flesh is truly food: to all the rest I willingly shut my eyes." As if heretics would not have equal plausibility on their side, if they willingly were ignorant that Christ was conceived by the Holy Ghost, because, believing that he is the seed of Abraham, they make no farther inquiry. Only we ought to preserve such moderation about the secret works of God, as not to desire to know anything more than what he determines by his word.

Footnotes

1 - "De manger la chair de Christ."

How can this man give us his flesh to eat? - Our Lord removes this difficulty, and answers the question, in John 6:63.

(12) The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us [his] flesh to eat?
(12) Flesh cannot make a difference between fleshly eating, which is done by the help of the teeth, and spiritual eating, which consists in faith: and therefore it condemns that which it does not understand: yet nonetheless, the truth must be preached and taught.

The Jews therefore strove among themselves,.... Fell to cavilling and disputing one among another; some understanding Christ, and others not; some being for him, and vindicated what he said; and others being against him, and who were the majority, objected,
saying how can this man give us his flesh to eat? which is to be understood, not physically, but as morally impossible and unlawful; since, with the Jews, it was not lawful to eat the flesh of any creature alive, and much less the flesh of man; for the Jews understood Christ of a corporeal eating of his flesh, being strangers to a figurative or spiritual eating of it by faith, in which sense he meant it.

The flesh and blood of the Son of man, denote the Redeemer in the nature of man; Christ and him crucified, and the redemption wrought out by him, with all the precious benefits of redemption; pardon of sin, acceptance with God, the way to the throne of grace, the promises of the covenant, and eternal life. These are called the flesh and blood of Christ, because they are purchased by the breaking his body, and the shedding of his blood. Also, because they are meat and drink to our souls. Eating this flesh and drinking this blood mean believing in Christ. We partake of Christ and his benefits by faith. The soul that rightly knows its state and wants, finds whatever can calm the conscience, and promote true holiness, in the redeemer, God manifest in the flesh. Meditating upon the cross of Christ gives life to our repentance, love, and gratitude. We live by him, as our bodies live by our food. We live by him, as the members by the head, the branches by the root: because he lives we shall live also.

Jews strove among themselves--arguing the point together.
How can, &c.--that is, Give us His flesh to eat? Absurd.

Observe the degrees: the Jews are tried here; the disciples, John 6:60-66, the apostles, John 6:67.

*More commentary available at chapter level.


Discussion on John 6:52

User discussion of the verse.






*By clicking Submit, you agree to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use.